San Mateo Podiatry Group

Make a PaymentCall Today! 650-342-2420 Menu
  • Home
  • About Us
  • New Visitors
  • Services
  • Contact
News / Don’t Be Misled: The Truth Behind the MICRA Initiative

Don’t Be Misled: The Truth Behind the MICRA Initiative

on June 24, 2014

The battle between doctors and trial lawyers grows more infantile: LA Times – Michael Hiltzik

California initiative campaigns have a way of reducing all important public policy issues to their lowest intellectual denominators — and highest financial numerators. The coming battle over the state’s medical malpractice limits looks certain to set records in both categories.

Advocates of raising the cap, including Consumer Watchdog, have chosen to go the initiative route to get the necessary changes made, and therein lies the problem. Their proposal, headed for the November 2014 ballot, combines a raise in the MICRA cap to $1 million, to be adjusted for inflation, with a mandate for random drug tests on doctors practicing in hospitals, along with other substance abuse-related provisions.

This is a childish, unwarranted step.

The fight is shaping up as a duel between consultants, with millions of dollars in campaign funds destined to be shot down the rathole. The trial lawyers have the estimable Chris Lehane on the payroll. The CMA, as reported by the San Francisco Chronicle’s Phillip Matier and Andrew Ross, has hired Sacramento consultant Gale Kaufman for its side. Its initiative proposal, if it’s genuine, hasn’t been made public; a CMA spokeswoman said only that Kaufman’s been hired to defeat the Consumer Watchdog measure, which is in the signature-gathering stage. [Update: The CMA says it’s not planning to pursue a counter-initiative.]

This is what happens when you legislate by initiative. An effort this summer to bring the lawyers and doctors together for a negotiated solution to the MICRA issue failed miserably, as everyone assumed it would. But neither proposed initiative meets the needs of California patients.

Drug testing for doctors may or may not be a necessity. But if you were writing a bill to create a sensible program, you wouldn’t do it through this initiative. For one thing, it’s too scatter-shot; medical experts say that if there’s a need for random testing of doctors, it’s with surgeons and anesthesiologists, whose procedures are invasive and therefore especially dangerous if done while impaired. Imposing random testing on all hospital doctors is arguably an unnecessary imposition.

Another provision requires medical professionals to turn in any doctors they believe have a drug or alcohol problem. But whether “snitch” laws like this actually work is wide open to question.

In any event, the California Medical Board already has considerable authority to suspend and discipline doctors with substance abuse issues — the initiative does almost nothing to enhance its enforcement.

The drug provisions look like they’re in the initiative to threaten doctors into supporting a MICRA reform. Its backers deny that, but their real rationale almost looks worse. The drug rules are in the initiative because they poll well, and the backers figure that’s the way to get the public to support the measure.

“It’s the ultimate sweetener,” says Jamie Court, the head of Consumer Watchdog. He says that when his group brought the proposal before focus groups, “the only thing that made them light up was drug testing of doctors.” That’s a pretty poor excuse for an initiative provision, and a reminder of what’s wrong with the California system. If you think doctors should be drug-tested, make the case on its merits. If you think MICRA should be reformed, make that case. But to use the public’s emotionalism about drugs to enact something completely different seems fundamentally manipulative and undemocratic. 

The right way to deal with MICRA is through the legislature, with a considered approach that recognizes the unfairness of the existing cap. Dealing with substance abuse by doctors also requires care — not a focus group-driven popularity contest. What’s needed least of all is using the initiative process while the important issues remain unaddressed.

Recent News

  • What is minimally invasive foot and ankle surgery?
  • At Risk Foot Care: 8 Top Tips
  • Survey finds prior authorization hurdles have led to serious adverse events
  • Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus – Allograft no better than micro fracture?

Categories

  • all
  • exclusives
  • press releases
  • smpg in the news
  • technology & research
  • trending topics
  • what's new in foot and ankle surgery

Reserve Your Consultation Today!

Learn why more families in the San Francisco Bay Area chose us for their foot and ankle care!

Reserve Online
Meet Your Doctors

Learn More

Why Choose Us?

Learn More

Health Insurance Explained

Learn More

Contact Information

San Mateo Podiatry Group
1750 El Camino Real, Suite 106
Burlingame, CA 94010

Monday to Friday, 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
Same Day Urgent Care Consults Available

Reserve Your Visit Online
Call Today: 650-342-2420

Connect

  • Home
  • News
  • Careers
  • Media Inquiries
  • Contact Us

About

  • Who We Are
  • Meet The Doctors
  • Meet The Team
  • Why Choose Us?
  • Advantage: Podiatry
  • Client Testimonials

Patient Resources

  • New Visitors
  • Your Consultation
  • Patient Portal
  • Telemedicine
  • Out of Town Patients 
  • Health Insurance FAQ
  • Financing Options

Downloads

  • Registration Forms
  • Financial Policies
  • Practice Policies
  • Privacy Notices (HIPAA)
  • Patient Education Library
  • Stretching Instructions
  • After-Surgery Instructions

© Copyright 2021 San Mateo Podiatry Group

Since 1917, A Tradition of Excellence in Foot and Ankle Care.

All Rights Reserved | Terms of Use and Privacy Policy